NOMINEE SERVICES
26 May 2025
An anonymous LLC is a type of limited liability company that enables beneficial owners to keep their personal details from being stored on public records related to the business. This is distinct from traditional forms of LLC, which usually allow ownership information to be accessible via state databases. While legal ownership of anonymous enterprises is still traceable through private or regulatory disclosures, there is still a greater level of confidentiality.
Ascot provides global services to businesses seeking to register and operate legitimate LLCs with anonymity, rather than being limited to specific U.S. states. We’ve put together this guide to dive a little deeper into the concept, exploring its various benefits and drawbacks.
Anonymized LLCs function largely in similar ways to the standard type. The difference in structure lies in how the ownership of the company is registered and recorded in public databases. As a result of legislation in certain U.S. states—including Delaware, New Mexico, and Wyoming—individuals are able to form LLCs without disclosing the identities of key members or managers in public filings.
From a practical standpoint, LLC anonymity is usually achieved by individuals or groups using registered agents to file any documentation. In some instances, there will be additional layers of anonymity applied through the use of trusts or holding companies. As a result, while names of holding companies or registered agents will appear on public records, the identities of the true owners on legal filings and databases remain anonymous.
Owner anonymity and privacy is made possible by the application of a few key methods. Some ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs)—true owners of the company and its assets—use one method, while others utilize a combination approach. These methods are:
Each of these methods leverages the distinction between beneficial ownership vs legal ownership. While beneficial owners are the true owners of the company and its assets, legal owners are parties or entities registered on public records on behalf of UBOs.
It’s important to recognize, though, that anonymity only applies to public records. Regulatory authorities and other official bodies may still require full disclosure of owners’ identities.
There are various stand-out advantages for entrepreneurs and investors considering using anonymized LLCs. Chief among these is robust privacy protections. By keeping their identities from public records, members maintain a level of discretion that can be valuable when operating in sensitive, high-risk, or high-profile industries. Particularly for high-net-worth individuals, this anonymity can also offer protection from frivolous lawsuits.
Furthermore, anonymity provides a distinct separation of personal and business identities. As a result, investors and members can maintain a certain amount of reputational security when operating in controversial or emerging sectors. In some instances—especially in sensitive industries that attract a lot of scrutiny— registering an LLC anonymously mitigates unsolicited contact, harassment, or other forms of targeting. While members aren’t concealed from authorities, anonymity is nonetheless a strategic measure for protecting members from unwanted or unwarranted public attention.
Anonymity can certainly be beneficial, but it’s vital to understand that there are potential limitations and risks involved. Firstly, anonymity in this context isn’t absolute. Banks and tax authorities will still usually require UBO disclosure, which means that owners will still be held accountable under certain laws and regulations. Indeed, anonymized LLCs can attract additional regulatory scrutiny in some jurisdictions, especially when operations involve international transactions that are subject to greater transparency standards.
Another consideration to bear in mind is that filing rules for anonymized LLCs can vary between states, which can result in inconsistencies around corporate compliance requirements. This contributes to another common drawback—these structures are often more complex to set up and maintain. UBOs must dedicate time, attention, and capital toward the operational burdens of anonymity, such as arranging layered entities, making nominee appointments, and utilizing registered agent services, among others.
While these risks aren’t necessarily deal-breakers, they highlight the level of attention that goes into running an anonymous entity correctly. Improper use can raise red flags and legal concerns among the public, industry regulators, and government authorities.
Any anonymous owner of an LLC is subject to a range of obligations when registering and maintaining this type of structure. These include complying with specific standards, laws, and rules, including:
The key element to understand here is that anonymity in these circumstances is purely public-facing. The ownership of the company will not be a secret from banks or government authorities. Failure to comply with related obligations could lead to legal investigations or penalties.
We’ve primarily discussed how anonymity for LLCs operates in the context of the U.S. While there aren’t always direct facsimiles of this legislation available in all jurisdictions across the globe, there are methods to apply the principles of owner privacy internationally.
Firstly, mechanisms like corporate nominee services can support owner confidentiality. These are third parties that are appointed to act as the legal face of the company in specified jurisdictions. Why use a nominee company? Well, while nominees are listed on registration and other documents, the UBO maintains control of the business.
Similarly, some entrepreneurs choose to register in offshore jurisdictions—such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI) or the Seychelles—due to their robust corporate privacy laws.
Another common international approach is to combine LLCs registered abroad with trusts or layered entities. This essentially makes the third-party entities or trustees the officially named owners of the LLC, while still providing the UBO with control and privacy.
In certain U.S. states and international jurisdictions, owners can remain off public records. They may still be identified to regulatory or financial authorities, though.
It is legal when formed in adherence to relevant state laws and used for lawful purposes.
In the U.S., Delaware, New Mexico, and Wyoming are among those that currently allow non-disclosure of members on public records.
Yes, but banks require beneficial owners to participate in full identity verification as part of due diligence and KYC rules.
No, while the specific tax approach depends on the LLC classification (single-member, multi-member), tax obligations are the same regardless of anonymity.
While anonymized LLCs rely on legal allowances around non-disclosure at a state level, nominee companies are third-parties appointed to hold legal positions on behalf of the UBO.
FATF. (2023, 10 March). Guidance on Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.html
Chen, J. (2024, August 6). Know Your Client (KYC): What It Means and Compliance Requirements. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/k/knowyourclient.asp
IRS. (2025, February 14). Limited liability company (LLC). IRS. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/limited-liability-company-llc
Legal And Compliance
26 May 2025
Compliance for startups is the set of processes aimed at complying with a company’s legal, regulatory and operational obligations. These areas include data protection, HR practices, financial disclosures, and licensing. In this article we will discuss in detail all the information necessary for entrepreneurs to start and expand a business internationally. Thanks to its international […]
Business Formation
27 May 2025
Starting a business is exciting—but early mistakes can lead to serious problems. Early-stage missteps can lead to legal issues, financial strain, or operational breakdowns that are difficult to reverse. In this article we will highlight the most common mistakes to avoid when creating a company to prevent problems and unpleasant consequences. Ascot International helps you […]
Nominee Services
26 May 2025
An authorized signatory is someone qualified to sign contracts and documents on behalf of a company or organization. Authorization is granted through a formal company resolution (e.g., a resolution of the board of directors or a notarized deed) explicitly stating who has signing authority and in which matters. This guarantees that the signatory can be […]